Ferdinand II of Aragon
The King's CurseFerdinand II of Aragon appears chiefly through the consequences of Isabella I of Castile’s death and the negotiations surrounding his daughter Katherine of Aragon. Once a joint ruler of Spain, he is left ruling the Kingdom of Aragon alone; the loss diminishes his wealth and standing and changes the political circumstances in which Katherine must pursue her marriage to Prince Henry.
Dynastic Position
Before Isabella’s death, Ferdinand and Isabella jointly ruled Spain. Their oldest daughter, Juana, inherited the throne of the Kingdom of Castile from her mother. Ferdinand consequently retained only the Kingdom of Aragon, a sharp contraction of the authority and resources associated with the Spanish crown. The narrative describes his wealth and position as having been more than halved, and presents Katherine as no longer the daughter of both monarchs of Spain but as the daughter of Ferdinand of Aragon.
Isabella’s Death and Its Consequences
The change in Ferdinand’s position is conveyed through Katherine’s experience of bereavement and diminished status. Isabella had written to her daughter rarely and without much warmth, but Katherine continued to hope for her letters and missed her. Her mother’s death therefore brings personal grief alongside a political reversal: Juana’s inheritance divides the former joint rule, and Katherine’s connection to the Spanish crown no longer carries the same weight. The book links that shift to the English court’s altered treatment of Katherine, noting that Prince Henry and his father no longer visit her as they once did.
Dowry and the Marriage Negotiation
Ferdinand’s dealings with the English king are presented through competing financial demands. Henry VII insists that Spain pay Katherine’s full dowry before her marriage to Prince Henry can proceed. Ferdinand responds by demanding immediate, full payment of Katherine’s widow’s jointure from the English king. The paired claims make Katherine’s future marriage inseparable from unresolved obligations arising from her earlier marriage to Arthur Tudor: each ruler presses the other to settle what is owed before the next arrangement can be completed.
Katherine’s parents had also sought a papal dispensation for her marriage to Prince Henry, stating that her marriage to Arthur Tudor had not been consummated. The dispensation was described at court as deliberately ambiguous, capable of being read in more than one way. The account does not detail Ferdinand’s individual part in drawing up or interpreting it, but places him within the parental and diplomatic arrangements that shaped Katherine’s contested marital prospects.
Narrative Role
Ferdinand remains an offstage political figure, defined less by direct action in the narrated scenes than by the consequences of his changed sovereignty and his claims on behalf of Katherine. His reduced kingdom helps explain why Katherine’s former royal standing becomes precarious, while the dispute over her dowry and jointure shows how dynastic marriage is also a matter of money and competing obligations. Through him, the narrative connects the division of Spain to the vulnerability of a widowed princess negotiating her place at the English court.